Thursday, September 18, 2008

In Vitro Fertilization


Infertility is a problem that most of us hardley ever think about. However, it affects millions of people in the United States alone. For some it can be emotionally and even financially devastaing. Infertility can be due either to the man or the woman for various reasons. He may have low sperm count, she may have blocked tubes, or have had an ovarian cyst. Some people are born infertile. The list goes on. Technology, however has made it possible for infertile couples to still concieve a child. There are various processes available to aid in the conpection of a baby. Among these forms of assisted reproduction is in vitro fertilization. You may be more familiar with the term "test tube baby." With in virto fetilization, a sperm and egg are combined in a laboratory and then placed back into the mother with hopes that implantation will occur and a fetus will grow. Above is an egg being injected with sperm by a needle. (image from Tyler Medical Clinic, 2001)


There are many difficulties with in vitro fertilization. For starters, it is very expensive. It can cost thousands of dollars for this procedure to be carried out once. In some cases it is performed a few times and the cost goes through the roof. Also, the chances of an infertile couple actually having a baby are slim. The chance of in vitro resulting in a baby after the first attempt is less than 30 percent (depending on age). If the first attempt fails, the second and third attempts have an even lower chance of success. Another problem that in vitro fertilization creates is the birth of multiples (twins, triplets, quadruplets, etc.) To increase the chances that this procedure will work, several eggs are fertilized and placed back into the mother in the hopes that at least one will implant and result in a fetus. If more than one of these fertilized eggs implants, it results in the birth of multiples. This is dangerous to both the mother and the babies. The entire pregnancy and birth process are risky. Damage can easily be done to the mother and chances of birth defects are considerably higher.


Many ethical questions are raised as well since this process of concieving a child is obviously not natural. Many people think that doctors are playing the role of God by creating life. Some people think that this ability will lead to misuse. If we can do this then why can't we pick our child's eye color or height? Should we be allowed to genetically engineer our children? I think that in vitro fertilization is a fair option for young couples who have enough money to throw around. If you can afford to potentially lose thousands of dollars then why not give it a shot and try for a baby. If you do not have this kind of money it is a different situation. Many doctors will put pictures of babies all over thier offices and thankyou letters from previous patients who did concieve a child. This leads infertile couples to believe that they can have a baby too, even though in reality the chances are very small. This is false advertising in a way and is very misleading to a hopeful couple. I think that most couples do not give adoption enough consideration. In a lot of cases this is probably the best and most realistic choice. I think that in some ways it is better to adopt and love a baby that already exists than trying the extremes to bring a new one into the world.


For more details on in virto fertilization try: http://www.emedicinehealth.com/in_vitro_fertilization/article_em.htm

1 comment:

Kalli said...

I really enjoyed reading your first posting. In the past couple of years, a relative of mine who has been able to get pregnant has tried this procedure and has failed at becoming pregnant. After 4 attempts and no outcomes, she continues to try again. Our family, being very supportive although does not tell her the negatives, does not try to tell her that doing it over and over again is just damaging her body and make it less likely to become pregnant when she is able to. The family has spent a huge amount of money because insurance does not cover it, and it is probably damaging her body as well. I am very pro-adopting and would definitely consider it myself if I was unable to get pregnant naturally. I feel as though this "invention" is a good thing although some people really stretch thier limits for their own biological children when there are so many children out there already that need a family.